Hi Reader, If you believe the latest move from Meta is political... who knows? 🤷♀️ Let's unpack this. Meta has recently announced a major shift in focus: discontinuing its third-party fact checking initiatives that continuously reviewed content for accuracy and authenticity. Essentially, they've determined that their fact-checking contains bias because its efforts are run by people. It's been kind of a mess. Over the past few years, third-party fact-checkers have been utilized to pinpoint content that was inaccurate or "fake news." They would inform Meta, who would then suppress that content's reach on the platforms. But, the fact-checkers themselves didn't have the authority to remove content - only Meta did. Are we getting political yet? Mark Zuckerberg admitted, "We think one to two out of every 10 of these actions (to remove content) may have been mistakes (i.e., the content may not have actually violated our policies)." So, Meta is taking a page from X's playbook, moving to Community Notes where users themselves will be able to add clarification or added comments and perspectives. It's basically saying, "We're out." Meanwhile, X's Community Notes gets mixed reviews. What does it all mean as a user of Meta's platforms? You may see a lot more information go unchecked. The responsibility will be on each of us to determine whether a post is real or fake, or whether we're getting factual information. Understanding and participating in Community Notes will be crucial, and research on this method so far shows users are too slow to intervene. What does it mean for your business?
It's important to remain vigilant about the content associated with your brand and to actively monitor your social media presence to maintain credibility and trust with your audience. If you have a Social Media Policy in place, ensure your internal guidelines are updated to reflect these platform changes, perhaps emphasizing the importance of accurate information sharing and respectful engagement. As always, I'm here to support. With gratitude, Allie @ Twilight Social Media Sources: More Speech and Fewer Mistakes |
Hi Reader, Here's something I had to "unlearn" as a social media manager. In my marketing classes (back in the day), the mantra was if that you wanted someone to do something, make it as easy as possible for them to do it. This meant including the most need-to-know information in a concise, easy-to-read format. This might have been a map or set of instructions, or in more recent years, a QR code or website link. Which brings me to my topic: overlinking. What do I mean? Including external...
Hi Reader, When you're scrolling socials, do you ever find that engaging with content now takes soooo much work? Like. Share. Follow. Save. Comment. Screenshot. Reshare. You're not alone. We're simply consuming so much content that it's taking more effort than it ever has before. Why hit the Follow button on an account when it's already being suggested to me in reels? I just DM'd this reel to a friend, so who am I hitting the Like button for? There is a mental toll associated with engaging on...
Hi Reader, Some might disagree, but here's what I think. Part of the appeal of the internet and social media is that you have the opportunity to be someone you're not. That's been true since the early days (I can't believe I'm saying that). But, I'm seeing a shift. Authenticity is a big buzz word when it comes to social media content this year, and it may be for good reason. Maybe we're tired of seeing our friends and family project the best parts of themselves online when the real truth is...